![]() The measurements refer to the gigatons of CO 2 equivalent reduced/sequestered (2020–2050) with the minimum efforts required for the higher goal and the maximum efforts required for the lower goal. Below is a table of the top ten solutions included on the organization's website, with the impacts of their respective emissions based on either. Scenario 1 shows a 2 ☌ temperature rise by 2100, while Scenario 2 shows a 1.5 ☌ temperature rise by 2100. Project Drawdown uses different scenarios to assess what different changes to global climate efforts might look like. The team measured and modeled each solution's carbon impact through the year 2050, its total and net cost to society, and its total lifetime savings. Central to the project is the compilation of a list of the "most substantive solutions to global warming." The list, which encompasses only technologically viable existing solutions, was compiled by a team of more than 200 scholars, scientists, policymakers, business leaders, and activists and is now online. The Project Drawdown organization's website includes video lessons that explain the analysis and insights behind the efforts and research that make up the science behind the project. Project Drawdown also organizes various solutions into groups that fit these principles to make up the Drawdown Framework.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |